jev-calibration-audit GitHub avatar by jujumilk3

jujumilk3 /

Evaluation & Observability

jev-calibration-audit

Audits Jev calibration, option-wording effects and Korean judgments through public APIs and datasets.

License: MITLanguage: PythonLast push: 9/18/2026#evaluation-benchmarks#classification-ranking

What Jev Does in this Architecture

Collects Noul and Choice outputs and compares them with labels for error, accuracy and stability.

Key Architecture Benefit

Keeps per-call records and experiment notes to qualify conclusions.

Review & Benchmark Note: Calibration varies with tasks, labels and answer options. These experiments do not guarantee reliable confidence in every domain. README and integration source reviewed at a fixed commit; not independently run or benchmarked by this site.
Clone Repository
git clone https://github.com/jujumilk3/jev-calibration-audit.git

Inspect on GitHub

Check out the upstream repository README, issues, and commit log.

jujumilk3/jev-calibration-audit

Architecture Category

Evaluation & Observability

Evaluation harnesses, latency profiling, tracing, and telemetry for Jev decisions.

View all in this category →

Related Projects in Evaluation & Observability

jev-review repository icon by NiazMorshed2007

NiazMorshed2007

jev-review

126
Evaluation & ObservabilityMITTypeScript

A local MCP code-quality reviewer returning structured scores to coding Agents.

What Jev does here

Jev scores correctness, complexity, tests and security; code ranks areas to improve.

Compares scores across checkpoints while leaving code changes to the primary Agent.

#coding-agents#mcp-integrations#evaluation-benchmarks
104 evidence links
Inspect details
jev-benchmarks repository icon by AbdelStark

AbdelStark

jev-benchmarks

9
Evaluation & ObservabilityApache-2.0Python

A benchmark comparing Jev and GLiNER on text classification, probability calibration and selective automation.

What Jev does here

Runs the same labeled text tasks through both backends and records probabilities, latency and failures.

Helps examine task-specific accuracy and whether confidence scores support chosen thresholds.

#evaluation-benchmarks#classification-ranking
3 evidence links
Inspect details
Evaluation & ObservabilityMITTypeScript

A MoonBit and TypeScript Jev playground covering games, browsers, command risk and small languages.

What Jev does here

Experiments send action candidates or typed questions to Jev, then execute or record the answers.

Includes source, experiment notes and some offline replays for comparing decision designs.

#evaluation-benchmarks#games-simulation#browser-automation
4 evidence links
Inspect details