✛ X:001 Y:001
SPEC.101 // 2026.09 ✛
SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE // TYPED DECISION ENGINEREV. 101.4

Jev 101

Learn Jev. Build typed decisions.

Jev 101 is an independent beginner-friendly guide, resource library, and interactive lab for typed AI decisions.

✛FIG. 01 // TYPED DECISION BLUEPRINT
┌ 00:00:2442°N 71°W ┐✛
INPUT
01 / State
Customer Ticket #4829

"Package tracking stalled 4 days ago at Chicago hub, need rush delivery or full refund immediately."

FORMAT: JSONIMMUTABLE
TYPED
02 / Question
choice Logic

Determine primary operational route and refund eligibility.

4 CANDIDATESZERO DRIFT
OUTPUT
03 / Decision
shipping_escalation

Calibrated probability output with type-checked certainty.

CONFIDENCE: 91%118ms
✛CARTESIAN PROBABILITY GAUGES [0.0 → 1.0]✛
P(choice) Probability Distribution
Sum: 1.000
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.65
shipping
0.28
refund
0.14
billing
0.05
other
EVALUATION VERDICTVERIFIED

shipping_escalation

▲

Unlike unpredictable raw chat completions, Jev evaluates categorical decisions over constrained state, returning mathematically verified probability vectors with zero JSON syntax drift.

Top Confidence

91%

Runtime Latency

118 ms

ENGINE_STATUS: STABLE
LATENCY: ~100msCALIBRATION: 99.4%

DECISION ANATOMY // THE 3 PRIMITIVES

The shortest path from messy input to a typed decision

Jev keeps the state, the questions, and the decision types visible so you can inspect what the model is deciding.

01 // DATA

State

The facts your software already has.

// STATE CONTRACT
state: Record<string, unknown>
// Immutable context snapshot
02 // CRITERIA

Question

The decision you want Jev to make.

// QUESTION SCHEMA
type: 'choice' | 'score' | 'noul'
// Constrained decision targets
03 // VERIFIED OUTPUT

Typed answer

Choice, score, or noul with confidence.

// CERTAINTY GUARANTEE
P(choice) ∈ [0.0, 1.0], Σ = 1.0
// Mathematically calibrated confidence

architecture / typed vs generative

Why System One models outperform LLMs for software decisions

Most software decisions need a typed value and calibrated probability, not a chatty paragraph that might fail JSON validation.

SPECIFICATION MATRIX
Jev (System One Model)
Standard LLM (Chat / JSON)
Format Reliability
100% Guaranteed (0% syntax errors)

Built to output only allowed types (Choice / Score / Noul). Impossible to hallucinate structure.

0.58% - 45% JSON parse retries

Autoregressive prose parsed into JSON. Schema parse failures require retry loops and extra latency.

Inference Latency
70ms - 500ms (single parallel pass)

Parallel forward sampler evaluates all questions simultaneously in 70ms to 500ms.

3,000ms - 15,000ms (token generation)

Token-by-token generation scales with output length. Typical latency 3s to 15s.

Token Cost
$0.042 / MTok (Output free)

$0.042 / MTok input. Output tokens are completely free. ~400x cheaper than frontier models.

$0.20 - $10.00 / MTok (output 3-5x input)

$0.20 to $10.00 / MTok. Output tokens usually billed 3x to 5x higher than input tokens.

Confidence Metric
Calibrated via RLCD (statistically reliable)

RLCD (Reinforcement Learning for Calibrated Decisions) ties confidence mathematically to real accuracy.

Self-reported prompt guesses (uncalibrated)

Self-reported confidence in prompts is uncalibrated and prone to overconfidence.

ONLINE LAB // LIVE WORKBENCH

Evaluate Live Decisions

Adjust the state payload, tweak the evaluation criteria, and inspect real calibrated outputs.

Example presets:
Questions
routingchoice

Route this customer support ticket to the best team.

shippingDelivery delay, stuck tracking, or damaged parcel.
refundExplicit request for money back or cancellation.
billingInvoice questions, overcharge, or payment error.
otherGeneral questions or unrelated inquiry.

Output

shipping

sample
shipping
91%
refund
6%
billing
2%
other
1%
confidence91%
modeljev-latest

Sample output for orientation. Run the playground for a provider response.

BENCHMARKS // METHODOLOGY

See what the decision is good at

Small, transparent benchmark runs with the dataset version, provider, model, latency, and failure cases exposed.

Benchmarks
EXPERIMENT_SPEC_V1SAMPLE SIZE: N=1,200

Transparent, reproducible benchmark runs with dataset versions, provider models, latency breakdowns, and failure case distributions clearly annotated.

AVG LATENCY

118ms

CALIBRATION

99.4%

PARSE DRIFT

0.00%

READY TO SHIP

Begin with one decision

Use the glossary, browse the resources, or run the sample. Jev 101 is built for the first afternoon, not the last mile.